[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:10:10 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/mce: Simplify flow when handling recoverable
memory errors
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:15:18AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> Oh -- does it need to sleep?
>>
>> Oh yeah, iterates over all tasks and generally async access to VM stuff.
>> You can have a look if bored: mm/memory-failure.c
>>
>> :-)
>>
>>> I find myself wondering whether a much cleaner solution might be to
>>> sync regs and switch stacks before invoking do_machine_check rather
>>> than afterwards. Then do_machine_check would really be completely
>>> non-atomic. It would add a few lines of asm, though.
>>
>> That's like wagging the dog.
>
> Wagging this particular dog might shake some loose fur off. If we did
> this for all paranoid entries, then paranoid_userspace could just be
> deleted. :)
Andi is about to make this dog even messier. I think I like my
suggestion more and more.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists