[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141112153906.GL29390@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:39:06 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched/deadline: support dl task migration during cpu
hotplug
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:08:44PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > @@ -1185,8 +1223,9 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
> > * We have to consider system topology and task affinity
> > * first, then we can look for a suitable cpu.
> > */
> > - cpumask_copy(later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);
> > - cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> > + cpumask_copy(later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> > + if (likely(task_rq(task)->online))
> > + cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);
>
> So, here you consider the span only when the task_rq is online,
> but there might be others cpus still online belonging to the same
> rd->span. And you have to consider them when migrating. Actually,
> migration must still be restricted to the online cpus of task's
> original rd->span, or I fear you can break clustered scheduling.
Ah, good point that, we must somehow find the right root domain to
'restore' the task to. Now I'm not entirely sure we still have this.
Lemme ponder that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists