[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141112165352.GA2945@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:53:53 +0100
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/cputime: fix clock_nanosleep/clock_gettime
inconsistency
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:58:43PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Commit d670ec13178d0 "posix-cpu-timers: Cure SMP wobbles" fixes one glibc
> test case in cost of breaking another one. After that commit, calling
> clock_nanosleep(TIMER_ABSTIME, X) and then clock_gettime(&Y) can result
> of Y time being smaller than X time.
>
> Below is full reproducer (tst-cpuclock2.c) :
>
> /* Parameters for the Linux kernel ABI for CPU clocks. */
> ((~(clockid_t) (pid) << 3) | (clockid_t) (clock))
Looks like # started lines were eaten. Here is reproducer that compile:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
/* Parameters for the Linux kernel ABI for CPU clocks. */
#define CPUCLOCK_SCHED 2
#define MAKE_PROCESS_CPUCLOCK(pid, clock) \
((~(clockid_t) (pid) << 3) | (clockid_t) (clock))
static pthread_barrier_t barrier;
/* Help advance the clock. */
static void *chew_cpu(void *arg)
{
pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
while (1) ;
return NULL;
}
/* Don't use the glibc wrapper. */
static int do_nanosleep(int flags, const struct timespec *req)
{
clockid_t clock_id = MAKE_PROCESS_CPUCLOCK(0, CPUCLOCK_SCHED);
return syscall(SYS_clock_nanosleep, clock_id, flags, req, NULL);
}
static int64_t tsdiff(const struct timespec *before, const struct timespec *after)
{
int64_t before_i = before->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + before->tv_nsec;
int64_t after_i = after->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + after->tv_nsec;
return after_i - before_i;
}
int main(void)
{
int result = 0;
pthread_t th;
pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
if (pthread_create(&th, NULL, chew_cpu, NULL) != 0) {
perror("pthread_create");
return 1;
}
pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
/* The test. */
struct timespec before, after, sleeptimeabs;
int64_t sleepdiff, diffabs;
const struct timespec sleeptime = {.tv_sec = 0,.tv_nsec = 100000000 };
/* The relative nanosleep. Not sure why this is needed, but its presence
seems to make it easier to reproduce the problem. */
if (do_nanosleep(0, &sleeptime) != 0) {
perror("clock_nanosleep");
return 1;
}
/* Get the current time. */
if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &before) < 0) {
perror("clock_gettime[2]");
return 1;
}
/* Compute the absolute sleep time based on the current time. */
uint64_t nsec = before.tv_nsec + sleeptime.tv_nsec;
sleeptimeabs.tv_sec = before.tv_sec + nsec / 1000000000;
sleeptimeabs.tv_nsec = nsec % 1000000000;
/* Sleep for the computed time. */
if (do_nanosleep(TIMER_ABSTIME, &sleeptimeabs) != 0) {
perror("absolute clock_nanosleep");
return 1;
}
/* Get the time after the sleep. */
if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &after) < 0) {
perror("clock_gettime[3]");
return 1;
}
/* The time after sleep should always be equal to or after the absolute sleep
time passed to clock_nanosleep. */
sleepdiff = tsdiff(&sleeptimeabs, &after);
if (sleepdiff < 0) {
printf("absolute clock_nanosleep woke too early: %" PRId64 "\n", sleepdiff);
result = 1;
printf("Before %llu.%09llu\n", before.tv_sec, before.tv_nsec);
printf("After %llu.%09llu\n", after.tv_sec, after.tv_nsec);
printf("Sleep %llu.%09llu\n", sleeptimeabs.tv_sec, sleeptimeabs.tv_nsec);
}
/* The difference between the timestamps taken before and after the
clock_nanosleep call should be equal to or more than the duration of the
sleep. */
diffabs = tsdiff(&before, &after);
if (diffabs < sleeptime.tv_nsec) {
printf("clock_gettime difference too small: %" PRId64 "\n", diffabs);
result = 1;
}
pthread_cancel(th);
return result;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists