[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546391DE.7040508@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:59:10 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: use the maximum MFN to calculate
the required DMA mask
On 12/11/14 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.11.14 at 16:25, <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>> +u64
>> +xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + u64 max_mfn;
>> +
>> + max_mfn = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_maximum_ram_page, NULL);
>> +
>> + return DMA_BIT_MASK(fls64(max_mfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + 1);
>> +}
>
> The value the hypercall returns is exclusive and an unsigned long.
The docs in include/public/memory.h say:
"Returns the maximum machine frame number of mapped RAM in this system."
Which sounds inclusive to me... Do we need a doc update here?
> Hence I'd suggest
>
> u64
> xen_swiotlb_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
> {
> unsigned long max_mfn;
>
> max_mfn = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_maximum_ram_page, NULL);
>
> return DMA_BIT_MASK(__fls(max_mfn - 1) + 1 + PAGE_SHIFT);
> }
>
> Jan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists