[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141112172739.GH16807@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:27:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/mce: Simplify flow when handling recoverable
memory errors
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:20:58PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Sorry, I am a bit confused...
>
> On 11/11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > Roughly speaking, we want to be able to mark a task with the sign of
> > death and to kill it, if needed.
>
> "it" is current, yes?
Yes.
> So I agree with Andy, task_work_add() can work and you can also pass
> paddr/restartable to the handler.
Yes, and it is much simpler than changing the entry.S glue to switch to
the kernel stack for our purposes.
> But,
>
> > The important part is *before* it
> > gets to run again.
>
> But it is already running? Perhaps you meant "before it returns to
> user-mode" ?
Right, it runs, while it does so, it triggers an MCE because it touches
some corrupted memory, we jump to the #MC handler and before we return
to user space, we kill that process.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists