[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141112011720.217572132@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:16:32 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Harris <jefftharris@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 026/123] [jffs2] kill wbuf_queued/wbuf_dwork_lock
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
commit 99358a1ca53e8e6ce09423500191396f0e6584d2 upstream.
schedule_delayed_work() happening when the work is already pending is
a cheap no-op. Don't bother with ->wbuf_queued logics - it's both
broken (cancelling ->wbuf_dwork leaves it set, as spotted by Jeff Harris)
and pointless. It's cheaper to let schedule_delayed_work() handle that
case.
Reported-by: Jeff Harris <jefftharris@...il.com>
Tested-by: Jeff Harris <jefftharris@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/jffs2/jffs2_fs_sb.h | 2 --
fs/jffs2/wbuf.c | 17 ++---------------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/jffs2/jffs2_fs_sb.h
+++ b/fs/jffs2/jffs2_fs_sb.h
@@ -134,8 +134,6 @@ struct jffs2_sb_info {
struct rw_semaphore wbuf_sem; /* Protects the write buffer */
struct delayed_work wbuf_dwork; /* write-buffer write-out work */
- int wbuf_queued; /* non-zero delayed work is queued */
- spinlock_t wbuf_dwork_lock; /* protects wbuf_dwork and and wbuf_queued */
unsigned char *oobbuf;
int oobavail; /* How many bytes are available for JFFS2 in OOB */
--- a/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c
@@ -1162,10 +1162,6 @@ static void delayed_wbuf_sync(struct wor
struct jffs2_sb_info *c = work_to_sb(work);
struct super_block *sb = OFNI_BS_2SFFJ(c);
- spin_lock(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
- c->wbuf_queued = 0;
- spin_unlock(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
-
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
jffs2_dbg(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
jffs2_flush_wbuf_gc(c, 0);
@@ -1180,14 +1176,9 @@ void jffs2_dirty_trigger(struct jffs2_sb
if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
return;
- spin_lock(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
- if (!c->wbuf_queued) {
+ delay = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
+ if (queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &c->wbuf_dwork, delay))
jffs2_dbg(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
- delay = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
- queue_delayed_work(system_long_wq, &c->wbuf_dwork, delay);
- c->wbuf_queued = 1;
- }
- spin_unlock(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
}
int jffs2_nand_flash_setup(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
@@ -1211,7 +1202,6 @@ int jffs2_nand_flash_setup(struct jffs2_
/* Initialise write buffer */
init_rwsem(&c->wbuf_sem);
- spin_lock_init(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&c->wbuf_dwork, delayed_wbuf_sync);
c->wbuf_pagesize = c->mtd->writesize;
c->wbuf_ofs = 0xFFFFFFFF;
@@ -1251,7 +1241,6 @@ int jffs2_dataflash_setup(struct jffs2_s
/* Initialize write buffer */
init_rwsem(&c->wbuf_sem);
- spin_lock_init(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&c->wbuf_dwork, delayed_wbuf_sync);
c->wbuf_pagesize = c->mtd->erasesize;
@@ -1311,7 +1300,6 @@ int jffs2_nor_wbuf_flash_setup(struct jf
/* Initialize write buffer */
init_rwsem(&c->wbuf_sem);
- spin_lock_init(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&c->wbuf_dwork, delayed_wbuf_sync);
c->wbuf_pagesize = c->mtd->writesize;
@@ -1346,7 +1334,6 @@ int jffs2_ubivol_setup(struct jffs2_sb_i
return 0;
init_rwsem(&c->wbuf_sem);
- spin_lock_init(&c->wbuf_dwork_lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&c->wbuf_dwork, delayed_wbuf_sync);
c->wbuf_pagesize = c->mtd->writesize;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists