lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141112011721.751100958@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:17:06 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 060/123] qla_target: dont delete changed nacls

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org>

commit f4c24db1b7ad0ce84409e15744d26c6f86a96840 upstream.

The code is currently riddled with "drop the hardware_lock to avoid a
deadlock" bugs that expose races.  One of those races seems to expose a
valid warning in tcm_qla2xxx_clear_nacl_from_fcport_map.  Add some
bandaid to it.

Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
@@ -762,7 +762,16 @@ static void tcm_qla2xxx_clear_nacl_from_
 	pr_debug("fc_rport domain: port_id 0x%06x\n", nacl->nport_id);
 
 	node = btree_remove32(&lport->lport_fcport_map, nacl->nport_id);
-	WARN_ON(node && (node != se_nacl));
+	if (WARN_ON(node && (node != se_nacl))) {
+		/*
+		 * The nacl no longer matches what we think it should be.
+		 * Most likely a new dynamic acl has been added while
+		 * someone dropped the hardware lock.  It clearly is a
+		 * bug elsewhere, but this bit can't make things worse.
+		 */
+		btree_insert32(&lport->lport_fcport_map, nacl->nport_id,
+			       node, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	}
 
 	pr_debug("Removed from fcport_map: %p for WWNN: 0x%016LX, port_id: 0x%06x\n",
 	    se_nacl, nacl->nport_wwnn, nacl->nport_id);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ