linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.17 046/319] fs: Fix theoretical division by 0 in super_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141112011000.247882214@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:04 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.17 046/319] fs: Fix theoretical division by 0 in super_cache_scan().

3.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>

commit 475d0db742e3755c6b267f48577ff7cbb7dfda0d upstream.

total_objects could be 0 and is used as a denom.

While total_objects is a "long", total_objects == 0 unlikely happens for
3.12 and later kernels because 32-bit architectures would not be able to
hold (1 << 32) objects. However, total_objects == 0 may happen for kernels
between 3.1 and 3.11 because total_objects in prune_super() was an "int"
and (e.g.) x86_64 architecture might be able to hold (1 << 32) objects.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/super.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(st
 	inodes = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc->nid);
 	dentries = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc->nid);
 	total_objects = dentries + inodes + fs_objects + 1;
+	if (!total_objects)
+		total_objects = 1;
 
 	/* proportion the scan between the caches */
 	dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, dentries, total_objects);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/