[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415775644.1761.1.camel@linux-0dmf.site>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:00:44 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Mathy Vanhoef <vanhoefm@...il.com>
Cc: brudley@...adcom.com, Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Franky Lin <frankyl@...adcom.com>, meuleman@...adcom.com,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>, pieterpg@...adcom.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: unlink URB when request timed out
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 20:02 -0500, Mathy Vanhoef wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 04:08 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Which means that you are freeing memory that may still be used by DMA
> > at this time.
> > In addition you have no guarantee that the unlink is indeed finished
> > by the time the URB is reused.
> > If you wish to take this approach you better forget about this URB
> > and allocate a new one and free the buffer from the callback.
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Good catch. I think the DMA issue is also present in the current driver: it
> frees the buffer without unlinking/killing the URB at all. Can a malicious USB
Yes, it is present.
> device force a timeout to occur (i.e. delay the call to the completion
> handler)? If so this might be a use-after-free vulnerability.
>
> It seems using usb_kill_urb instead of usb_unlink_urb in the patch prevents any
> possible use-after-free. Can someone double check?
usb_kill_urb() will do the job.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists