linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/123] 3.10.60-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:22:34 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/123] 3.10.60-stable review

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:55PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:21:48PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 11/11/2014 05:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.60 release.
> > >There are 123 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >let me know.
> > >
> > >Responses should be made by Fri Nov 14 01:17:00 UTC 2014.
> > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > 
> > As an early heads up, I see some builds failing in 3.10 and 3.14 with
> > 
> > drivers/of/selftest.c: In function 'of_selftest':
> > drivers/of/selftest.c:224:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_selftest_property_match_string' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   of_selftest_property_match_string();
> >   ^
> > drivers/of/selftest.c: At top level:
> > drivers/of/selftest.c:129:20: warning: 'of_selftest_property_string' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >  static void __init of_selftest_property_string(void)
> >                     ^
> > 
> > Not surprising, since commit 'of: Fix overflow bug in string property
> > parsing functions' replaces the now missing function with the defined
> > but unused function, apparently without changing the caller.
> > Oddly enough, the referenced upstream commit _does_ replace the
> > function name for both caller and callee.
> 
> Crap, I took the "ignore the rejects" too literally when applying that
> patch, let me go rework it and see if I can fix it up.

And I've fixed it now.  I doubt it's worth rolling a new -rc release for
this, given the low number of builds that are failing.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/