[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54634627.60502@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:36:07 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Srikanth Thokala <sriku.linux@...il.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <liviu.dudau@....com>,
<lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] PCI: generic: Add msi_parent DT binding
On 11/12/14 13:56, Srikanth Thokala wrote:
>> @@ -122,9 +123,19 @@ static int gen_pci_config_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>> > return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>> > }
>> >
>> >+static int gen_pci_set_msi_parent(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> >+{
>> >+ struct gen_pci *pci = bus_to_gen_pci(bus);
>> >+
>> >+ bus->msi = pci->mchip;
>> >+
>> >+ return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>> >+}
>> >+
>> > static struct pci_ops gen_pci_ops = {
>> > .read = gen_pci_config_read,
>> > .write = gen_pci_config_write,
>> >+ .set_msi_parent = gen_pci_set_msi_parent,
> We assign the msi chip through add_bus() call, do we still need this?
Certain architecture (i.e arm64) doesn't implement struct hw_pci.
Therefore, there is no add_bus(). However, this new API should allow
non-arch dependent implementation.
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists