[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141112122900.GA1542@salvia>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:29:00 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] seq_putc: Convert to return void and convert
uses too.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2014-11-10 10:58:57, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Using the return value of seq_putc is error-prone, so
> > make it return void instead.
> >
> > Reverse the logic in seq_putc to make it like seq_puts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
>
> The changes are correct. The show() functions should return 0
> even when there is an overflow. They are called by traverse()
> from seq_read() that might increase the buffer size and try again.
Just in case you need this for the netfilter chunks:
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists