lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546474AF.2030902@hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:06:55 +0800
From:	"Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@...com>
To:	Minfei Huang <mhuang@...hat.com>
CC:	joro@...tes.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/iommu: fix incorrect bit operations in setting
 values

Minfei,
Thanks for your testing.
On my system, I got error messages:

[    8.019096] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=1
[    8.019617] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 102
[    8.019621] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [01:00.0] fault addr 
fff6a000
[    8.019621] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[    8.019627] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
[    8.019631] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [21:00.0] fault addr 
fff6a000
[    8.019631] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[    8.019638] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
[    8.019641] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [41:00.0] fault addr 
fff6a000
[    8.019641] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[    8.019647] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 202
[    8.019651] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [61:00.0] fault addr 
fff6a000
[    8.019651] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set

And this patch can fix this.


The reason you do not get error messages may be there is no ongoing DMA
request on your PCI devices when kdump kernel boots, I am not sure of
this.

Zhenhua
On 11/12/2014 07:28 PM, Minfei Huang wrote:
> The kdump starts 2nd kernel without any error message when I use
> 3.18.0-rc4 merged last 6 patchs. The following is the message which 2nd
> kernel prints during booting.
>
> Patchset:
> 	0001-iommu-vt-d-Update-iommu_attach_domain-and-its-caller.patch
> 	0002-iommu-vt-d-Items-required-for-kdump.patch
> 	0003-iommu-vt-d-data-types-and-functions-used-for-kdump.patch
> 	0004-iommu-vt-d-Add-domain-id-functions.patch
> 	0005-iommu-vt-d-enable-kdump-support-in-iommu-module.patch
> 	0006-x86-iommu-fix-incorrect-bit-operations-in-setting-va.patch
>
> log:
> [    1.689604] IOMMU intel_iommu_in_crashdump = true
> [    1.694310] IOMMU Skip disabling iommu hardware translations
> [    1.699987] DMAR: No ATSR found
> [    1.703151] IOMMU Copying translate tables from panicked kernel
> [    1.710786] IOMMU: root_new_virt:0xffff8800296ec000 phys:0x0000296ec000
> [    1.717401] IOMMU:0 Domain ids from panicked kernel:
> [    1.722364] DID did:13(0x000d)
> [    1.725424] DID did:12(0x000c)
> [    1.728482] DID did:11(0x000b)
> [    1.731542] DID did:10(0x000a)
> [    1.734603] DID did:6(0x0006)
> [    1.737574] DID did:7(0x0007)
> [    1.740549] DID did:5(0x0005)
> [    1.743522] DID did:9(0x0009)
> [    1.746495] DID did:8(0x0008)
> [    1.749467] DID did:4(0x0004)
> [    1.752439] DID did:3(0x0003)
> [    1.755413] DID did:2(0x0002)
> [    1.758385] DID did:0(0x0000)
> [    1.761357] DID did:1(0x0001)
> [    1.764331] ----------------------------------------
> [    1.769302] IOMMU 0 0xfed50000: using Queued invalidation
>
> On 11/05/14 at 03:30pm, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
>> The function context_set_address_root() and set_root_value are setting new
>> address in a wrong way, and this patch is trying to fix this problem.
>>
>> According to Intel Vt-d specs(Feb 2011, Revision 1.3), Chapter 9.1 and 9.2,
>> field ctp in root entry is using bits 12:63, field asr in context entry is
>> using bits 12:63.
>>
>> To set these fields, the following functions are used:
>> static inline void context_set_address_root(struct context_entry *context,
>>          unsigned long value);
>> and
>> static inline void set_root_value(struct root_entry *root, unsigned long value)
>>
>> But they are using an invalid method to set these fields, in current code, only
>> a '|' operator is used to set it. This will not set the asr to the expected
>> value if it has an old value.
>>
>> For example:
>> Before calling this function,
>> 	context->lo = 0x3456789012111;
>> 	value = 0x123456789abcef12;
>>
>> After we call context_set_address_root(context, value), expected result is
>> 	context->lo == 0x123456789abce111;
>>
>> But the actual result is:
>> 	context->lo == 0x1237577f9bbde111;
>>
>> So we need to clear bits 12:63 before setting the new value, this will fix
>> this problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-hual@...com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index a27d6cb..11ac47b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static inline void set_root_present(struct root_entry *root)
>>   }
>>   static inline void set_root_value(struct root_entry *root, unsigned long value)
>>   {
>> +	root->val &= ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>>   	root->val |= value & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -247,6 +248,7 @@ static inline void context_set_translation_type(struct context_entry *context,
>>   static inline void context_set_address_root(struct context_entry *context,
>>   					    unsigned long value)
>>   {
>> +	context->lo &= ~VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>>   	context->lo |= value & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
>>   }
>>
>> --
>> 2.0.0-rc0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ