[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113101456.43acfdb7.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:14:56 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virito: introduce methods of fixing device features
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:11:30 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 11/13/2014 04:46 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:52:53 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> +static inline void virtio_disable_feature(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> >> + unsigned int fbit)
> >> +{
> >> + BUG_ON(fbit >= VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START);
> >> + BUG_ON(vdev->config->get_status(vdev) &
> >> + ~(VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER));
> > When we add virtio-1 support, we can add a check for FEATURES_OK here,
> > so we're really on the safe side.
> >
>
> If I read the spec correctly, FEATURES_OK was set only after writing the
> features bits to device. But we want to sanitize the them before.
I meant doing a BUG when FEATURES_OK is set - sorry for not being clear.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists