lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:21:01 +0100
From:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, x86@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 7/8] xen: switch to linear virtual mapped
 sparse p2m list

On 11/11/2014 06:47 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 11/11/14 05:43, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> At start of the day the Xen hypervisor presents a contiguous mfn list
>> to a pv-domain. In order to support sparse memory this mfn list is
>> accessed via a three level p2m tree built early in the boot process.
>> Whenever the system needs the mfn associated with a pfn this tree is
>> used to find the mfn.
>>
>> Instead of using a software walked tree for accessing a specific mfn
>> list entry this patch is creating a virtual address area for the
>> entire possible mfn list including memory holes. The holes are
>> covered by mapping a pre-defined  page consisting only of "invalid
>> mfn" entries. Access to a mfn entry is possible by just using the
>> virtual base address of the mfn list and the pfn as index into that
>> list. This speeds up the (hot) path of determining the mfn of a
>> pfn.
>>
>> Kernel build on a Dell Latitude E6440 (2 cores, HT) in 64 bit Dom0
>> showed following improvements:
>>
>> Elapsed time: 32:50 ->  32:35
>> System:       18:07 ->  17:47
>> User:        104:00 -> 103:30
>>
>> Tested on 64 bit dom0 and 32 bit domU.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>
> Can you please test this with the following guests/scenarios.
>
> * 64 bit dom0 with PCI devices with high MMIO BARs.

I'm not sure I have a machine available with this configuration.

> * 32 bit domU with PCI devices assigned.
> * 32 bit domU with 64 GiB of memory.
> * domU that starts pre-ballooned and is subsequently ballooned up.
> * 64 bit domU that is saved and restored (or local host migration)
> * 32 bit domU that is saved and restored (or local host migration)

I'll try.


Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ