lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:44:41 +0000
From:	"Chen, Hanxiao" <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	"containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 1/2] procfs: show hierarchy of pid namespace



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Weinberger [mailto:richard@....at]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:15 PM
> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄; Eric W. Biederman; Serge Hallyn; Oleg Nesterov
> Cc: containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; David
> Howells; Richard Weinberger; Pavel Emelyanov; Vasiliy Kulikov; Mateusz Guzik
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] procfs: show hierarchy of pid namespace
> 
> Am 12.11.2014 um 11:08 schrieb Chen Hanxiao:
> > We lack of pid hierarchy information, and this will lead to:
> > a) we don't know pids' relationship, who is whose child:
> >    /proc/PID/ns/pid only tell us whether two pids live in different ns
> > b) bring trouble to nested lxc container check/restore/migration
> > c) bring trouble to pid translation between containers;
> >
> > This patch will show the hierarchy of pid namespace
> > by pidns_hierarchy like:
> >
> > <init_PID> <parent_of_init_PID> <relative PID level>
> >
> > Ex:
> > [root@...alhost ~]#cat /proc/pidns_hierarchy
> > 18060 1 1
> > 18102 18060 2
> > 1534  18102 3
> > 1600  18102 3
> > 1550  1 1
> > *Note: numbers represent the pid 1 in different ns
> >
[snip]
> > +
> > +#define NS_HIERARCHY	"pidns_hierarchy"
> > +#define MAX(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
> 
> Please use max() from kernel.h, there is no need to reinvent the wheel.
> 

Thanks for your reminding.

> > +
> > +/* list for host pid collection */
> > +struct pidns_list {
> > +	struct list_head list;
> > +	struct pid *pid;
> > +	int show_level;
> 
> s/show_level/level, to keep it easy. :-)

Sure, also change the type to unsigned int 
for making max() happy.

[snip]
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * collect pids and stored in pidns_pid_list,
> 
> s/stored/store
Oops...

> 
> > + * then remove duplicated ones,
> > + * add the rest to pidns_pid_tree
> > + */
> 
> This comment is a bit confusing.
> 
> What about "proc_pidns_list_refresh - Finds all init pids, places them into
> pidns_pid_list
> and then stores the hirarchy into pidns_pid_tree."?
> 
That's much more clear.

> Beside of my minor comments I like the patch. :-)
> Thanks a lot for doing this work!
> 

Thanks for your kindly help. :)

- Chen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ