[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546482FC.2090207@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:07:56 +0800
From: Charles Chiou <ch1102chiou@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: JBottomley@...allels.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 3/4] scsi:stex.c Add reboot support
On 11/13/2014 01:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static int stex_reboot_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>> + unsigned long val,
>> + void *data)
>> +{
>> + if (val == SYS_RESTART)
>> + isRestart = 1;
>> + return NOTIFY_OK;
>> +}
>>
>> @@ -1832,7 +1859,14 @@ static void stex_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> struct st_hba *hba = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>
>> - stex_hba_stop(hba);
>> + if (hba->yellowstone == 1)
>> + stex_hba_stop(hba, ST_IGNORED);
>> + else {
>> + if (isRestart)
>> + stex_hba_stop(hba, ST_S6);
>> + else
>> + stex_hba_stop(hba, ST_S5);
>> + }
>
> This sort of check for reboot vs restart isn't really something
> we want in drivers. I don't really know how we could find this
> out assuming we even want drivers to behave differently.
>
> Maybe Greg or someone on lkml has an idea how to best handle this case.
>
I have no idea to distinguish OS is going to reboot or shut down without
this approach. I'll try to find it out.
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists