[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113105936.GA14070@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:59:37 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, kvm ML <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, entry: Switch stacks on a paranoid entry from
userspace
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:31:30AM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Is this something I can try under KVM?
>
> I don't know if KVM has a way to simulate a machine check event.
I've been thinking about it recently too - adding MCA functionality to
qemu/kvm could be very useful, especially the thresholding stuff, for
testing RAS kernel code.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists