[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113153228.GC9726@red-moon>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:32:28 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arnd@...db.de, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: generic: Add set_msi_parent callback
[CC'ing Arnd and RobH]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:33:44PM +0000, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> On 11/11/14 18:24, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> @@ -313,6 +324,9 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> > return err;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> >+ pci->mchip = of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(of_parse_phandle(np,
> >> >+ "msi-parent", 0));
> > This bit should be in the generic of_pci.c code and not duplicated for
> > each host controller.
> >
> > Will
>
> I forgot to mention and include in the patch that we are also
> introducing "msi-parent" binding to the generic host controller. I'll do
> that in v2.
>
> Unless this is something that we would like to add to the generic OF
> binding for PCI, I think it should be in the pci-host-generic.c.
Is there a reason why we do *not* want to add this property to generic OF
PCI binding ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists