[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHse=S-=43+vAK=jm-ONd4RasDpLfOr1JO-ZUMhh+peuS4FjxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:51:47 +0000
From: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/3] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:01:01 +0000 David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch set adds execveat(2) for x86
>
> I grabbed these. If someone else was planning to do so, feel free to
> shout at me.
>
> I haven't been following the discussion closely so some reviewed-by's
> and tested-by's would be nice.
Yes please -- Andy, Eric, Al?
> Thanks for writing a manpage. mtk.manpages@...il.com should have been
> cc'ed. He is now ;)
Thanks (for some reason I though cc'ing linux-api took care of Michael
seeing it).
> Your syscall number was taken by sys_bpf. I renumbered it
> appropriately.
Looks like the robots have also found a few things that need fixing:
1) Sparse warning on "close_on_exec(fd, current->files->fdt)": I guess
that needs a rcu_dereference_raw() or some such around arg2.
2) Syscall not implemented warning on sparc build: I could attempt to wire
up the sparc syscall (although I can only cross-compile it, not run it),
or is it best to leave it and ask sparclinux / David Miller nicely to take
care of it? Or have I just missed some bit of syscall machinery?
3) Non-canonical comment format just before the close_on_exec() call.
(Well, that last wasn't found by a robot -- thanks Andrew!)
When I generate a new version, would it be easier for you if I also merged up
against v3.18-rc4? That would at least take care of the syscall renumbering.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists