[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113174837.GB4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:48:37 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: b.L: fix unmet dependency for CPU_PM
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:44:22PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>
> > If BL_SWITCHER is enabled but SUSPEND and CPU_IDLE is not enabled
> > we are getting following config warning.
> >
> > warning: (BL_SWITCHER) selects CPU_PM which has unmet direct
> > dependencies (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
> >
> > So BL_SWITCHER should enable CPU_PM only if either of SUSPEND or
> > CPU_IDLE is selected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > index 9d580d0..fe3d969 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > @@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ config BL_SWITCHER
> > bool "big.LITTLE switcher support"
> > depends on BIG_LITTLE && MCPM && HOTPLUG_CPU
> > select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND
> > - select CPU_PM
> > + select CPU_PM if (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
>
> NAK. You just broke the code by doing this. CPU_PM is a requirement
> here. The dependencies for CPU_PM is lacking.
Is there any real technical reason that CPU_PM depends on SUSPEND ||
CPU_IDLE ? If not, those dependencies should be killed.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists