[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1411131611001.945-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:18:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
cc: johan@...nel.org, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: get/put around clearing needs_remote_wakeup
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Benson Leung wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > usbhid_stop probably doesn't need it. And it should be possible to fix
> > usbhid_close more easily just by interchanging the two lines:
> >
> > - usb_kill_urb(usbhid->urbin);
> > usbhid->intf->needs_remote_wakeup = 0;
> > + usb_kill_urb(usbhid->urbin);
> >
> > Have you tried this?
>
> Yes, I tried that as well, and that does work.
>
> I used the get/put because that's the way it was done in other
> drivers, for example in synusb_close() in
> drivers/input/mouse/synaptics_usb.c
In the patch description, you wrote:
> When a usbhid device that does not support remote wake
> ( i.e. !device_can_wakeup() ) is closed, we fail out of
> autosuspend_check() because the autosuspend check is called
> before the flag is cleared as a result of usb_kill_urb(usbhid->urbin);
If you interchange the two lines then the flag _will_ be cleared before
usb_kill_urb() and autosuspend_check() can run. This means your patch
description is bogus.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists