[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141113140936.e2e45a8970b5bb4195fd5065@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:09:36 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Cc: linux@...musvillemoes.dk, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
" Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, tytso@....edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, eric.paire@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] bitops: Fix shift overflow in GENMASK macros
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 10:54:19 +0100 Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com> wrote:
> On some 32 bits architectures, including x86, GENMASK(31, 0) returns 0
> instead of the expected ~0UL.
>
> This is the same on some 64 bits architectures with GENMASK_ULL(63, 0).
>
> This is due to an overflow in the shift operand, 1 << 32 for GENMASK,
> 1 << 64 for GENMASK_ULL.
>
> Fixes: 10ef6b0dffe404bcc54e94cb2ca1a5b18445a66b
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> #v3.13+
> Reported-by: Eric Paire <eric.paire@...com>
> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Why cc:stable? Does this bug cause some observed kernel misbehaviour?
If so, please fully describe that in the changelog. This will help
people to determine whether this patch might fix a bug they're
observing, and will help them to decide whether they should backport
this patch into their kernels.
I'm assuming that Peter will be merging this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists