[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113221441.GL7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:14:41 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Don't check for file->private_data on open(). It
is set by the core.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:34:50PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > Btrfs uses this in the transaction start ioctl to record the transaction
> > handle being started. Ceph is the main user of the ioctl, and we could
> > setup a hash table if needed. But which call path in miscdevice is
> > doing this?
> >
> > With your patch in place, btrfs would end up overwriting the miscdevice
> > private_data field, which would probably cause problems.
> >
> > -chris
> >
>
> I think i was mistaken, sorry. misc_open() used to set
> file->private_data _only_ if you use set .open in struct file_operations.
>
> In current -next this changed and file->private_data is set to struct
> miscdevice on a (userspace's) open call (misc_open()) just in any case.
>
> You do set .open so this wouldn't affect you and this patch can be ignored.
More to the point, this function is not reachable from anything in
file_operations of any miscdevice. btrfs_ioctl != btrfs_control_ioctl...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists