[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113025105.GA16652@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:51:09 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend] of: Add vendor 2nd prefix for Asahi Kasei Corp
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:21:49PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-13 at 02:18 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > > > Still missing is an update for checkpatch to warn when a deprecated
> > > > vendor prefix is used.
> > >
> > > Marking it deprecated and warning with checkpatch is certainly
> > > preferable.
> >
> > I guess removing "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt is very enough
> > for warn for a deprecated vendor prefix on checkpatch ?
>
> Huh? No idea what you mean.
> What are you suggesting about checkpatch?
Hi Joe,
I think that what Morimoto-san wanted to say was something like this:
I guess that removing the "ak" line from vendor-prefixes.txt would
be sufficient to cause checkpatch to generate a warning about
using the deprecated "ak" vendor prefix. Is that a good approach?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists