linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / domains: Kconfig: always enable PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpAXX+QPZm1AoTOQk5C7fdR8HcVRwvCHH-veWMDP9_4_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:28:19 +0100
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / domains: Kconfig: always enable PM_RUNTIME when
 genpd enabled

On 14 November 2014 08:26, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 13 November 2014 23:28, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org> wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>>
>> It makes little sense to use generic power domains without runtime PM.
>> Also, since the complexities of handling the !PM_RUNTIME case are
>> causing more trouble and confusion than they're worth, let's simplify
>> the world by making genpd always enable runtime PM.
>
> I do agree that your above statement seems reasonable, even if can't
> really tell if that would break some SOCs use-cases.
>
> My concern is though, that I fear we will be taking short-cuts in
> genpd that might bite us later on, but I might be wrong.
>
> The reason for my concern is that on every other place, like in the
> subsystem level, driver core, PM core and of course in drivers -  we
> need to cope with all the combinations of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.  So theoretically, why shouldn't genpd be able to do

/s /CONFIG_PM_SLEEP /CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME

> that as well?
>
>>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/power/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
>> index 3d39cc0228e9..2a8c64d0a43c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ config PM_CLK
>>
>>  config PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>>         bool
>> -       depends on PM
>> +       select PM_RUNTIME
>
> Shouldn't we actually depend on PM_RUNTIME instead?
>
>>
>>  config WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT
>>         bool "Enable workqueue power-efficient mode by default"
>> --
>> 2.1.3
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/