[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141114105915.GA10385@sudip-PC>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:29:15 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ALSA: ice1712: consider error value
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:43:31AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:09:06 +0530,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > earlier we were ignoring the return value of snd_ak4114_create and
> > always returning 0.
> > now we are returning the actual status. revo_init is calling this
> > function, and revo_init is checking the return value.
>
> It's not enough only to change there. The problem is that
> spec->ak4114 is dereferenced after snd_ak4114_create(), and this might
> be NULL. So it should return the error before that point.
>
oops .. i should have looked carefully.
one more thought:
shouldn't we also do a kfree(spec) on error ?
thanks
sudip
>
> Takashi
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
> > sound/pci/ice1712/revo.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/pci/ice1712/revo.c b/sound/pci/ice1712/revo.c
> > index 1112ec1..2835196 100644
> > --- a/sound/pci/ice1712/revo.c
> > +++ b/sound/pci/ice1712/revo.c
> > @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int ap192_ak4114_init(struct snd_ice1712 *ice)
> > * No reason to stop capture stream due to incorrect checks */
> > spec->ak4114->check_flags = AK4114_CHECK_NO_RATE;
> >
> > - return 0; /* error ignored; it's no fatal error */
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > static int revo_init(struct snd_ice1712 *ice)
> > --
> > 1.8.1.2
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists