linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 net 1/2] fm10k: Check tunnel header length in encap offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201411131654.19998.joestringer@nicira.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:54:19 -0800
From:	Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>
To:	"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Linux NICS <Linux-nics@...tope.jf.intel.com>,
	"therbert@...gle.com" <therbert@...gle.com>,
	"gerlitz.or@...il.com" <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
	"alexander.duyck@...il.com" <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 1/2] fm10k: Check tunnel header length in encap offload

On Thursday, November 13, 2014 16:41:03 Vick, Matthew wrote:
> On 11/13/14, 3:36 PM, "Joe Stringer" <joestringer@...ira.com> wrote:
> >fm10k supports up to 184 bytes of inner+outer headers. Add an initial
> >check to fail encap offload if these are too large.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>
> >---
> >Matthew, I didn't see the equivalent patch on netdev so I went ahead and
> >created it. If I've missed this somewhere, then please disregard.
> >
> >v2: First post.
> 
> You didn't miss it Joe--it just hasn't made it up yet. :) It's currently
> in Jeff's tree for testing. You're on the CC for the patch, so you'll get
> a notification once it goes up. It's basically the same as what you have,
> except the #define I use is 184 and I use inner_tcp_hdrlen() to account
> for the inner TCP header length.
> 
> Since your second patch should apply cleanly on top of mine, what do you
> think about dropping the first patch in this series and Jeff can send our
> two patches up together once they've passed testing?

Ah, that sounds great.

Cheers,
Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/