[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415967071.15154.9.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:11:11 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] bpf: add 'flags' attribute to
BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command
On Do, 2014-11-13 at 17:36 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> the current meaning of BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM syscall command is:
> either update existing map element or create a new one.
> Initially the plan was to add a new command to handle the case of
> 'create new element if it didn't exist', but 'flags' style looks
> cleaner and overall diff is much smaller (more code reused), so add 'flags'
> attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command with the following meaning:
> #define BPF_ANY 0 /* create new element or update existing */
> #define BPF_NOEXIST 1 /* create new element if it didn't exist */
> #define BPF_EXIST 2 /* update existing element */
Would a cmpxchg-alike function be handy here?
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists