[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54661ED9.8090901@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:25:13 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch V1 0/6] Refine generic/PCI MSI irqodmian interfaces
On 2014/11/14 23:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/11/14 14:26, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2014/11/14 22:11, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>>
>> We have achieved 1 and 2. And seems we could also achieve 3 by
>> converting all arch specific PCI MSI code to use hierarchy
>> irqdomain. But not sure whether we could achieve 4, not familiar
>> with ARM world:)
>
> Killing all the weak functions shouldn't be a problem for ARM, we're
> trying very hard not to rely on them.
>
> Killing msi_chip is a different story, as this is what we use to match a
> PCI host controller with its MSI controller (that's what the of_node
> field in msi_chip is for). See drivers/of/of_pci.c for details.
>
> Also, we use msi_chip directly in the MSI drivers as a way to go from a
> pci_dev to the MSI controller specific structure:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/tree/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c?h=irq/stacked-its-v2#n1143
>
> If we're going to kill msi_chip, we must make sure we have mechanisms
> that allow the conversion of the existing code.
Hi Marc,
Seem it doesn't worth the effort to remove irq_chip,
so I will focus on killing all weak functions first:)
After that, we may kill setup_irq and teardown_irq in irq_chip,
but seems irq_chip still has other usages, so I won't try to
kill irq_chip.
Regards!
Gerry
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists