[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141114174252.GE7969@dhcp128.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:42:52 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: Convert "vballon" kthread into a
workqueue
On Fri 2014-11-14 08:19:15, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michael, Petr.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > + /* The workqueue servicing the balloon. */
> > > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > > + struct work_struct wq_work;
> >
> > We could use system_freezable_wq instead.
> > I do agree a dedicated wq is better since this can get blocked
> > for a long time while allocating memory.
> > However, please add a comment to this effect.
>
> system_freezable_wq should be fine. Workqueues by default have a
> pretty high maximum concurrency level (256). There's no reason to
> create separate workqueues solely for that purpose.
Great. If nobody complains until next week, I will send an updated
patch with the system workqueue and also with the fixed typos.
Thanks all reviewers for nice hints.
Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists