[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfJHpoZvWxxo0axAoEDaObeQehSS4CzWoPxBG0520Hb44A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:03:40 +0300
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, tytso@....edu,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...inux.com, eric.paire@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] bitops: Fix shift overflow in GENMASK macros
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com> wrote:
> Looking at all GENMASK and GENMASK_ULL occurences in v3.18-rc4,
> I (only) found one possible candidate in drivers/spi/spi_xtensa-xtfpga.c:
>
> static u32 xtfpga_spi_txrx_word(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned nsecs,
> u32 v, u8 bits)
> {
> struct xtfpga_spi *xspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>
> xspi->data = (xspi->data << bits) | (v & GENMASK(bits - 1, 0));
> ...
> }
>
> Max F., can xtfpga_spi_txrx_word() be called with "bits" = 32?
No, bits should never be greater than 16, because spi_master sets its
bits_per_word_mask to SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(1, 16).
--
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists