[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6XLKFfHqga_1kc0fYGxj5Y2o32NSqD3=idyT7+pXUsSpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:51:27 -0800
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: "backports@...r.kernel.org" <backports@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@...e.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/21] backports: avoid git tree reinitialization
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 00:15 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
>>
>> When using backports against for packaging with --gitdebug you either
>> have to use --clean or assume the directory is empty already. In either
>> case you start fresh. With integration this will be a bit different, you
>> could end up with a project directory where the git tree was present but
>> only the target directory was empty.
>>
>> Calling git init on an already existing git directory will reinitialize
>> your git tree, that can reset some config stuff, let's avoid that.
>
> I guess I don't care much, but it seems strange to me that you'd use
> --gitdebug in this case, you'd end up committing crappy patches to the
> top-level kernel tree?
It was very useful to me when debugging, hence --gitdebug. Also, each
step is actually what some folks may want to see done / committed as
that may have been work done manually before for each kernel release
bump, now its just automated.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists