| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1415929010-9361-8-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:36:50 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 7/7] bpf: remove test map scaffolding and user proper types
proper types and function helpers are ready. Use them in verifier testsuite.
Remove temporary stubs
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
---
kernel/bpf/test_stub.c | 56 +++++++------------------------------------
samples/bpf/test_verifier.c | 14 +++++------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/test_stub.c b/kernel/bpf/test_stub.c
index fcaddff4003e..0ceae1e6e8b5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/test_stub.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/test_stub.c
@@ -18,26 +18,18 @@ struct bpf_context {
u64 arg2;
};
-static u64 test_func(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static struct bpf_func_proto test_funcs[] = {
- [BPF_FUNC_unspec] = {
- .func = test_func,
- .gpl_only = true,
- .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL,
- .arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
- .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY,
- },
-};
-
static const struct bpf_func_proto *test_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
{
- if (func_id < 0 || func_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(test_funcs))
+ switch (func_id) {
+ case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem:
+ return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto;
+ case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem:
+ return &bpf_map_update_elem_proto;
+ case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem:
+ return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto;
+ default:
return NULL;
- return &test_funcs[func_id];
+ }
}
static const struct bpf_context_access {
@@ -78,38 +70,8 @@ static struct bpf_prog_type_list tl_prog = {
.type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
};
-static struct bpf_map *test_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
-{
- struct bpf_map *map;
-
- map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_USER);
- if (!map)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- map->key_size = attr->key_size;
- map->value_size = attr->value_size;
- map->max_entries = attr->max_entries;
- return map;
-}
-
-static void test_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
-{
- kfree(map);
-}
-
-static struct bpf_map_ops test_map_ops = {
- .map_alloc = test_map_alloc,
- .map_free = test_map_free,
-};
-
-static struct bpf_map_type_list tl_map = {
- .ops = &test_map_ops,
- .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_UNSPEC,
-};
-
static int __init register_test_ops(void)
{
- bpf_register_map_type(&tl_map);
bpf_register_prog_type(&tl_prog);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 63402742345e..b96175e90363 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_unspec),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup = {2},
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_unspec),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "fd 0 is not pointing to valid bpf_map",
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_unspec),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_unspec),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 4, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_unspec),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, -56, 0),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -56),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_unspec),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup = {24},
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int create_map(void)
long long key, value = 0;
int map_fd;
- map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_UNSPEC, sizeof(key), sizeof(value), 1024);
+ map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(key), sizeof(value), 1024);
if (map_fd < 0) {
printf("failed to create map '%s'\n", strerror(errno));
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists