[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx-_EU6pgSY61YsA8qYVtNnz8PeJzU=h-NQy8pMJU-jxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:41:02 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Replace _PAGE_NUMA with PAGE_NONE protections
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>
> This series is very heavily based on patches from Linus and Aneesh to
> replace the existing PTE/PMD NUMA helper functions with normal change
> protections. I did alter and add parts of it but I consider them relatively
> minor contributions. Note that the signed-offs here need addressing. I
> couldn't use "From" or Signed-off-by from the original authors as the
> patches had to be broken up and they were never signed off. I expect the
> two people involved will just stick their signed-off-by on it.
Feel free to just take authorship of my parts, and make my
"Needs-sign-off's" be just "Acked-by:"
Or alternatively keep them as "Signed-off-by:", even when it looks a
bit odd if it doesn't have a "From:" me, when the actual patch won't
then actually go through me - I'm assuming this will come in through
the -mm tree.
As to the ppc parts, obviously it would be good to have Aneesh re-test
the series..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists