[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546899CF.8020808@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:34:23 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] kprobes: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the
function call "module_put"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:20:31 +0100
The module_put() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 3995f54..f1e7d45 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1527,8 +1527,7 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
out:
mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
- if (probed_mod)
- module_put(probed_mod);
+ module_put(probed_mod);
return ret;
}
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists