[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54684A9E.90606@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 22:56:30 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14
On 11/15/2014 08:20 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
> On 2014/11/16 11:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 11/15/2014 06:33 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> Hi Guenter,
>>> Could you please help to provide the config file and
>>> error messages?
>>
>> Config file:
>> https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/blob/master/rootfs/x86/qemu_x86_pc_nosmp_defconfig
> Hi Guenter,
> Thanks for help. According to the above configuration file:
> CONFIG_PCI_MSI is enabled, but CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC and
> CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC are both disabled. But the Kconfig for X86_LOCAL_APIC
> is defined as:
> config X86_LOCAL_APIC
> def_bool y
> depends on X86_64 || SMP || X86_32_NON_STANDARD || X86_UP_APIC
> || PCI_MSI
> select GENERIC_IRQ_LEGACY_ALLOC_HWIRQ
>
> That means CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC should be enabled if CONFIG_PCI_MSI is
> enabled. So how did you generate the qemu_x86_pc_nosmp_defconfig? Are
> you using an old configuration file?
I took the configuration file I had for the SMP case (located in the same
directory in the git repository), disabled SMP, and ran "make savedefconfig".
"old" is relative in this context; I don't usually create new configuration
files for each new kernel release, so, yes, you could say that the file
I used is "old".
CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is enabled. Keep in mind this is a configuration file
created with "make savedefconfig", so default settings are not included.
Correct, CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC is not enabled, but that is not really surprising
since its dependencies are not met as far as I can see.
Overall, I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say. X86_IO_APIC
depends on X86_64 (not set) or SMP (not set) or X86_32_NON_STANDARD (not set)
or X86_UP_IOAPIC (not set because it depends on X86_UP_APIC which depends on
!PCI_MSI).
Does that mean that I'll have to disable PCI_MSI to get x86 uniprocessor
support to work after your patch ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists