[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141116091918.56b859e8@bbrezillon>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:19:18 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] Add RGB444_1X12 and RGB565_1X16 media bus
formats
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:49:33 +0200
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:58:31 +0200
> > Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Boris,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:36:00AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> ...
> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h b/include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h
> >>> index 23b4090..cc7b79e 100644
> >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h
> >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h
> >>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> >>>
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED 0x0001
> >>>
> >>> -/* RGB - next is 0x100e */
> >>> +/* RGB - next is 0x1010 */
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB444_2X8_PADHI_BE 0x1001
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB444_2X8_PADHI_LE 0x1002
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB555_2X8_PADHI_BE 0x1003
> >>> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_BE 0x100b
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_LE 0x100c
> >>> #define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ARGB8888_1X32 0x100d
> >>> +#define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB444_1X12 0x100e
> >>> +#define MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_1X16 0x100f
> >>
> >> I'd arrange these according to BPP and bits per sample, both in the header
> >> and documentation.
> >
> > I cannot keep both macro values and BPP/bits per sample in incrementing
> > order. Are you sure you prefer to order macros in BPP/bits per sample
> > order ?
>
> If you take a look elsewhere in the header, you'll notice that the
> ordering has preferred the BPP value (and other values with semantic
> significance) over the numeric value of the definition. I'd just prefer
> to keep it that way. This is also why the "next is" comments are there.
>
My bad, I only had a look at RGB formats.
I'll fix that.
Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists