lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546881CA.2020801@suse.de>
Date:	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:51:54 +0100
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>, monstr@...str.eu,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] ARM: zynq: DT: Add OCM controller node

Hi Michal,

Am 14.11.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Michal Simek:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> index ce2ef5bec4f2..e217fb1c1169 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> @@ -150,6 +150,13 @@
>  			reg = <0xf8006000 0x1000>;
>  		};
> 
> +		ocmc: memory-controller@...0c000 {
> +			compatible = "xlnx,zynq-ocmc-1.0";
> +			interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +			interrupts = <0 3 4>;
> +			reg = <0xf800c000 0x1000>;
> +		};
> +
>  		uart0: serial@...00000 {
>  			compatible = "xlnx,xuartps", "cdns,uart-r1p8";
>  			status = "disabled";

Not directly related to this patch: As one can see here, the node order
is quite a mess... According to Olof, nodes should be ordered by unit
address, whereas here some but not all seem ordered by node name. Would
you welcome a cleanup patch, or can you fix that yourself?

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ