[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141117122319.GI25699@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:23:21 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Simon <longsleep@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 1/2] pwm: Add Allwinner SoC support
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:15:44PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> This adds a generic PWM framework driver for the PWM controller
> found on Allwinner SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ++
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 376 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 3865dfb9ed08..424359d3cbb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -262,6 +262,15 @@ config PWM_STI
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be called pwm-sti.
>
> +config PWM_SUN4I
> + tristate "Allwinner PWM support"
> + depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST
I think you're going to need a bunch of other dependencies here, too.
HAS_IOMEM and COMMON_CLK at least, I'd expect.
> + help
> + Generic PWM framework driver for Allwinner SoCs.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> + will be called pwm-sunxi.
According to the Makefile extract below it'll be called pwm-sun4i.
> +
> config PWM_TEGRA
> tristate "NVIDIA Tegra PWM support"
> depends on ARCH_TEGRA
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index c458606c3755..d607804deea1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP) += pwm-rockchip.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG) += pwm-samsung.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPEAR) += pwm-spear.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI) += pwm-sti.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUN4I) += pwm-sun4i.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA) += pwm-tegra.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIECAP) += pwm-tiecap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIEHRPWM) += pwm-tiehrpwm.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
[...]
> +static int sun4i_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + int duty_ns, int period_ns)
[...]
> +{
> + struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 clk_rate, prd, dty, val, clk_gate;
> + u64 div = 0;
> + unsigned int prescaler = 0;
> + int err;
> +
> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
> +
> + if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
> + /* First, test without any prescaler when available */
> + prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
> + /*
> + * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds
> + * is not an integer so round it half up instead of
> + * truncating to get less surprising values.
> + */
> + div = clk_rate * (u64)period_ns + NSEC_PER_SEC/2;
The cast here looks odd. Perhaps a better way would be to make clk_rate
a u64 so that type promotion rules will automatically cast here for you.
> + do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + if (div - 1 > PWM_PRD_MASK)
> + prescaler = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (prescaler == 0) {
> + /* Go up from the first divider */
> + for (prescaler = 0; prescaler < PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; prescaler++) {
> + if (!prescaler_table[prescaler])
> + continue;
> + div = clk_rate / prescaler_table[prescaler];
> + div = div * (u64)period_ns;
Type promotion rules should make the explicit cast unnecessary.
> + val = sun4i_pwm_readl(pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
> + for (i = 0; i < pwm->chip.npwm; i++) {
> + if (!(val & BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, i)))
> + pwm->chip.pwms[i].polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
> + }
There's no need for the braces here.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists