[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871tp2vbed.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:55:22 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Allow vmlinux to fallback to kallsyms on NO_LIBELF=1
Hi Arnaldo,
Sorry for late reply. I was offline last week.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:02:29 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:24:38PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:33:11PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >> Hmm.. I don't think it's specific to the minimal elf parser. The return
>> >> value of dso__load_sym() is a number of symbols found so when it sees a
>> >> dso with 0 symbols it'll fall back to the next option IMHO (not
>> >> tested). Did you see a problem with the current code?
>> >
>> > So your patch:
>> >
>> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-minimal.c
>> > @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ int dso__load_sym(struct dso *dso, struct map *map __maybe_unused,
>> > unsigned char *build_id[BUILD_ID_SIZE];
>> > int ret;
>> >
>> > + if (dso->kernel)
>> > + return 0; /* always use kallsyms */
>> > +
>> >
>> > changes the symbol-minimal.c file to add this exception. That is very
>> > much specific to the minimal elf parser, or am I just seeing things?
>>
>> What minimal parser does here is just skip kernel dsos (vmlinux) since
>> it didn't deal with all the details of parsing vmlinux currently.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > What I was saying, why not have a util/symbol.c change that disregards
>> > all DSOs with 0 symbols in.
>>
>> The util/symbol.c doesn't need this because it can handle vmlinux
>> reliably. So after reading symbol table, it'll use the dso if it
>
> symbol.c should not be able to handle anything, since the actual ELF
> loader is in symbol-elf.c or simbol-minimal.c, no?
Ah right, I was confused with symbol.c and symbol-elf.c - so I believe
the generic logic in symbol.c already handles DSOs with 0 symbol. The
problem was symbol-minimal.c didn't return 0 for the DSOs.
>
> I.e.:
>
> symbol.c::dso__load()
> symbol.c::dso__load_kernel_sym()
> symbol.c::dso__load_vmlinux()
>
> And then it heads into one of the ELF loaders, right now, without your
> patch, I see, when the minimal loader is used:
>
> symbol-minimal.c::dso__load_sym()
>
> reads the build-id and if it works, returns 1, which is a bug, it should
> return 0 in this case, possibly -1 if it doesn't read the build-id :-\
>
> I.e. it should return 0, because that way it signals: "I can't read it,
> thus no symbols were loaded, symbol.c: please go on looking for them
> somewhere else, kallsyms perhaps?".
Right. It's a bug for vmlinux. But by returning 0, it'll iterate over
the candidate binaries in dso__load(). I'm afraid that this *might*
overwrite the build-id of the DSO with different one. So I think it
also needs to add a check for valid build-id.
I'll update this patch with above.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> And this is the bug, probably. Now to look at your patches to see if
> this is touched somehow...
>
>> actually contains symbols or fallback to next dso if it has 0 symbols.
>> IOW it already disregards all dsos with 0 symbols in.
>
> See above.
>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists