[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141117150617.GD7046@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:06:17 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, sre@...ian.org, sre@...g0.de,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
aaro.koskinen@....fi, freemangordon@....bg, bcousson@...libre.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
sakari.ailus@....fi, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller
* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> [141117 07:03]:
> On Monday 17 November 2014 15:55:46 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > There's nothing stopping us from initializing the camera code
> > from pdata-quirks.c for now to keep it working. Certainly the
> > binding should be added to the driver, but that removes a
> > dependency to the legacy booting mode if things are otherwise
> > working.
>
> Tony, legacy board code for n900 is not in mainline tree. And
> that omap3 camera subsystem for n900 is broken since 3.5
> kernel... (both Front and Back camera on n900 show only green
> picture).
I'm still seeing the legacy board code for n900 in mainline tree :)
It's deprecated, but still there.
Are you maybe talking about some other piece of platform_data that's
no longer in the mainline kernel?
No idea what might be wrong with the camera though.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists