[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141117182413.GC12644@katana>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:24:13 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@...escale.com>
Cc: marex@...x.de, LW@...O-electronics.de, mark.rutland@....com,
fugang.duan@...escale.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] i2c: imx: add DMA support for freescale i2c
driver
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:40:36PM +0800, Yuan Yao wrote:
> Add dma support for i2c. This function depend on DMA driver.
> You can turn on it by write both the dmas and dma-name properties in dts node.
> DMA is optional, even DMA request unsuccessfully, i2c can also work well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@...escale.com>
gcc found a bug:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c:703:7: warning: 'orig_jiffies' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c:672:16: note: 'orig_jiffies' was declared here
> + result = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> + &i2c_imx->dma->cmd_complete,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(DMA_TIMEOUT));
And are you sure you want to use
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() instead of
wait_for_completion_timeout() here? Unless you confirm you tested it a
lot with signals, I really cannot recommend the *_interruptible_*
version.
Other than that, good. I liked the logfile of what you tested very much!
Thanks,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists