lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1416251225-17721-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:06:56 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	jolsa@...hat.com, kan.liang@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
	maria.n.dimakopoulou@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] perf/x86: add index param to get_event_constraint() callback

This patch adds an index parameter to the get_event_constraint()
x86_pmu callback. It is expected to represent the index of the
event in the cpuc->event_list[] array. When the callback is used
for fake_cpuc (evnet validation), then the index must be -1. The
motivation for passing the index is to use it to index into another
cpuc array.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |  4 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |  4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c   |  6 ++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 570e99b..422a423 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ int x86_schedule_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n, int *assign)
 
 	for (i = 0, wmin = X86_PMC_IDX_MAX, wmax = 0; i < n; i++) {
 		hwc = &cpuc->event_list[i]->hw;
-		c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(cpuc, cpuc->event_list[i]);
+		c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(cpuc, i, cpuc->event_list[i]);
 		hwc->constraint = c;
 
 		wmin = min(wmin, c->weight);
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static int validate_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (IS_ERR(fake_cpuc))
 		return PTR_ERR(fake_cpuc);
 
-	c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);
+	c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, -1, event);
 
 	if (!c || !c->weight)
 		ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 641b2df..141c17c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	u64		max_period;
 	struct event_constraint *
 			(*get_event_constraints)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+						 int idx,
 						 struct perf_event *event);
 
 	void		(*put_event_constraints)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
@@ -693,7 +694,8 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void)
 int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event);
 
 struct event_constraint *
-x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event);
+x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
+			  struct perf_event *event);
 
 struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index e4302b8..1cee5d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -430,7 +430,8 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
 }
 
 static struct event_constraint *
-amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
+			  struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	/*
 	 * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
@@ -538,7 +539,8 @@ static struct event_constraint amd_f15_PMC50 = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x3F, 0);
 static struct event_constraint amd_f15_PMC53 = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x38, 0);
 
 static struct event_constraint *
-amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
+			       struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	unsigned int event_code = amd_get_event_code(hwc);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 9345194..9b60b17 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1624,7 +1624,8 @@ intel_shared_regs_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
 }
 
 struct event_constraint *
-x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
+			  struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct event_constraint *c;
 
@@ -1641,7 +1642,8 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 }
 
 static struct event_constraint *
-intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
+			    struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct event_constraint *c;
 
@@ -1657,7 +1659,7 @@ intel_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event
 	if (c)
 		return c;
 
-	return x86_get_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+	return x86_get_event_constraints(cpuc, idx, event);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1891,9 +1893,12 @@ static struct event_constraint counter2_constraint =
 			EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x4, 0);
 
 static struct event_constraint *
-hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
+			  struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct event_constraint *c = intel_get_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+	struct event_constraint *c;
+
+	c = intel_get_event_constraints(cpuc, idx, event);
 
 	/* Handle special quirk on in_tx_checkpointed only in counter 2 */
 	if (event->hw.config & HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED) {
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ