[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUtKUWzwc57rzf-VZfAoZSzYZ6JujLdd_0Uc7nVCxF1YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:00:16 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, mm: set NX across entire PMD at boot
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> _brk_end is adjusted at boot time via extend_brk() up to __brk_limit,
> which is the same as _end. We usually do not use all of that space. So
> it's expected that _brk_end < _end.
>
>> Is this correct? It sounded like tglx wanted the pmd split, like this:
>
> Yes, I wanted to get rid of the high mapping for anything between
> _brk_end and _end, and I brought you on the wrong track with my
> suggestion to call free_init_pages(). Sorry about that.
:)
>
> That happened because I missed the completely non obvious fact, that
> only the effective brk section is reserved for the kernel via
> reserve_brk(). So the area between _brk_end and _end is already
> reusable. Though that reuse works only by chance and not by design and
> is completely undocumented as everything else in that area.
where is info for everything else?
>
> So the initial patch to get rid of the X mapping is of course to just
> extend the area to the PMD. A little bit different to your initial
> patch, but essentially the same.
>
> - unsigned long all_end = PFN_ALIGN(&_end);
> + unsigned long all_end = roundup((unsigned long) &_end, PMD_SIZE);
>
> I'm going to apply your V1 patch with the above roundup()
> simplification. If a page of that area gets used later on then we are
> going to split up the PMD anyway.
should use _brk_end instead of &_end for the roundup?
>
> But still we want to get rid of that highmap between _brk_end and
> _end, but there is absolutely no reason to come up with extra silly
> functions for that.
>
> So the obvious solution is to let setup_arch() reserve the memory up
> to _end instead of _bss_stop, get rid of the extra reservation in
> reserve_brk() and then let free_initmem() release the area between
> _brk_end and _end. No extra hackery, no side effects, just works.
So where get the highmap to be removed?
free_init_pages via free_initmem()?
with the code change like you suggested,
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 6 +-----
arch/x86/mm/init.c | 6 ++++++
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -286,10 +286,6 @@ static void __init cleanup_highmap(void)
static void __init reserve_brk(void)
{
- if (_brk_end > _brk_start)
- memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(_brk_start),
- _brk_end - _brk_start);
-
/* Mark brk area as locked down and no longer taking any
new allocations */
_brk_start = 0;
@@ -857,7 +853,7 @@ dump_kernel_offset(struct notifier_block
void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
{
memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(_text),
- (unsigned long)__bss_stop - (unsigned long)_text);
+ (unsigned long)_end - (unsigned long)_text);
early_reserve_initrd();
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
unsigned long end = (unsigned long) &__end_rodata_hpage_align;
unsigned long text_end = PFN_ALIGN(&__stop___ex_table);
unsigned long rodata_end = PFN_ALIGN(&__end_rodata);
- unsigned long all_end = PFN_ALIGN(&_end);
+ unsigned long all_end = roundup((unsigned long)&_end, PMD_SIZE);
printk(KERN_INFO "Write protecting the kernel read-only data: %luk\n",
(end - start) >> 10);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -637,9 +637,15 @@ void free_init_pages(char *what, unsigne
void free_initmem(void)
{
+ unsigned long all_end = roundup((unsigned long)&_end, PMD_SIZE);
+
free_init_pages("unused kernel",
(unsigned long)(&__init_begin),
(unsigned long)(&__init_end));
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ free_init_pages("unused brk", PFN_ALIGN(_brk_end), all_end);
+#endif
}
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
got
[ 7.942636] Freeing unused brk memory: 500K (ffffffff84383000 -
ffffffff84400000)
---[ High Kernel Mapping ]---
0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffff81000000 16M pmd
0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff82200000 18M ro PSE GLB x pmd
0xffffffff82200000-0xffffffff82c00000 10M ro PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffffffff82c00000-0xffffffff82e00000 2M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffffffff82e00000-0xffffffff83000000 2M RW GLB NX pte
0xffffffff83000000-0xffffffff83200000 2M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffffffff83200000-0xffffffff83400000 2M RW GLB NX pte
0xffffffff83400000-0xffffffff84200000 14M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
0xffffffff84200000-0xffffffff84400000 2M RW GLB NX pte
0xffffffff84400000-0xffffffffa0000000 444M pmd
the _brk_end to &_end highmap is still there
Also if you want to remove highmap between _brk_end and _end,
Do you want highmap for
[text_end, rodata_start)
[rodata_end, _sdata),
as mark_rodata_ro is calling
free_init_pages("unused kernel",
(unsigned long) __va(__pa_symbol(text_end)),
(unsigned long) __va(__pa_symbol(rodata_start)));
free_init_pages("unused kernel",
(unsigned long) __va(__pa_symbol(rodata_end)),
(unsigned long) __va(__pa_symbol(_sdata)));
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists