[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJiQ=7BH8K=Q+JcWTKSfn6xAteOF4B6jahMu_qVd-FyZWD3pjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:39:02 -0800
From: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jon Fraser <jfraser@...adcom.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 22/22] MIPS: Add multiplatform BMIPS target
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2014 09:01:02 Kevin Cernekee wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> Under arch/mips/bcm47xx I see a single mach type, but different builds
>> for BMIPS3300 (R1/SSB) versus MIPS 74K (R2/BCMA).
>
> At least in Kconfig, the two are not mutually exclusive, so I assumed
> you could enable them both at the same time.
Ah right, bcm47xx_defconfig doesn't actually enable
CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2. So it will still run on R1 CPUs like BMIPS3300.
On R2 systems it may lose a few optimizations/features.
I suspect that BCM47xx could use the BMIPS multiplatform kernel, if
somebody was willing to figure out how to convert board.c, leds.c,
etc.
>> > If you wanted to do that however, starting with BMIPS you'd have
>> > to make it possible to define a new platform without the
>> > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bmips/ directory (this should be possible
>> > already, so the hardest part is done), replace all global function
>> > calls (arch_init_irq, prom_init, get_system_type, ...) with generic
>> > platform-independent implementations or wrappers around per-platform
>> > callbacks, and move the Kconfig section for CONFIG_BMIPS_MULTIPLATFORM
>> > outside of the "System type" choice statement.
>>
>> Right. The other question is how much support for legacy non-DT
>> bootloaders really belongs in a true multiplatform kernel, as this
>> stuff gets hairy fast.
>
> Yes, that's why I suggested following PowerPC rather than ARM in this
> regard. If you move the boot loader abstraction into the decompressor
> instead of the platform code, you can avoid a lot of the problems.
One possible complication: for BCM63xx/BCM7xxx (MIPS) there is no
decompressor in the kernel. The firmware loads an ELF image into
memory and jumps directly to kernel_entry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists