linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Save MSI chip in pci_sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7hH=v15w2UgG3mWc_B=YQNA-ZXj_VO_9dHZ3oFrk_yjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:27:57 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@...wei.com>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> > The simplest way to dead with it is that I pull in pci/msi (assuming
>> > that it contains only the above) and base the rest of it on top, so I
>> > can deal with the resulting conflicts. So you still can keep that in
>> > your pile and no matter who sends the pull request first everything
>> > will just fall in place.
>>
>> In addition to the ("Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data") series, my
>> pci/msi branch contains these:
>>
>>   f83386942702 s390/MSI: Use __msi_mask_irq() instead of default_msi_mask_irq()
>>   03f56e42d03e Revert "PCI: Add x86_msi.msi_mask_irq() and msix_mask_irq()"
>>   38737d82f9f0 PCI/MSI: Add pci_msi_ignore_mask to prevent writes to
>> MSI/MSI-X Mask Bits
>>
>> but I don't think it will hurt if you pull in those as well.
>
> They are blessed by you, so I don't worry :)
>
>> The bigger problem might be the first patch of the "Save MSI chip in
>> pci_sys_data", which renames "struct msi_chip" to "struct
>> msi_controller".  I asked Yijing to do that because I didn't think
>> "_chip" really conveyed any information.  I didn't know we were going
>> to have quite this many MSI-related patches to fix up.
>
> Not a big deal at all. I pulled your branch and fixed up the pending
> mess on top of it. Not a really big deal.
>
>> So I'll just leave my pci/msi branch as-is for now.  If the rename is
>> too painful, let me know and I'll drop the branch and we can rework
>> the rest of the "Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data" series to match.
>
> No, not a problem at all. If I can carry your branch and it is
> immutable then I think we are fine.
>
> The changes we have stashed on top of this which touch linux/msi.h and
> pci/msi.c are at the end of this mail. But most of this is
> selfcontained and wont hurt anything which does not enable the
> required config options. The diffstat is:
>
>  drivers/pci/msi.c   |  334 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/msi.h |  158 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> Looks large, but it provides common infrastructure which allows ARM64
> to implement MSI support w/o any of the gazillion weak arch
> callbacks. Jiangs x86 work distangles the convoluted mess we have with
> irq remapping etc. and we can have non PCI based MSI interrupts as a
> bonus.
>
> So I'm pretty happy with the outcome now. The stacked irqdomains
> really worked out well so far. I don't think that the pci/msi.c side
> will see much updates on that in the next weeks. Though based on that
> we'll try to get rid of the whole weak arch_xxx in the long run, but
> that's a different issue and nothing we need to worry about now.
>
> I'm going to push out the current state of affairs soon and will ask
> all involved folks to have a look on that. If I don't hear someone
> crying murder I'm going to make the branch immutable and push it into
> next so that ARM and x86 can follow up with their stuff which depends
> on that whole endavour.
>
> If you have updates to your pci/msi stuff before the merge window then
> please let me know, so we can coordinate on the procedure.

Super.  Thank you very much for taking care of this; it's a big weight
off my mind.

You can add my Acked-by to these patches if you want it.  I would
suggest a minor comment expansion here, just because the code *looks
like* it's setting up something to match a hardware device:

> +/**
> + * pci_msi_domain_calc_hwirq - Generate a unique ID for an MSI source
> + * @dev:       Pointer to the PCI device
> + * @desc:      Pointer to the msi descriptor
> + *
> + * The ID number is only used within the irqdomain.

Maybe include something like:

  This "irq_hw_number_t" is an opaque identifier used only by the
irqdomain code.
  It does not correspond to any hardware implementation or register encoding.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/