[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3901050.KoSeMVLBPy@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:31:23 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / GPIO: Driver GPIO mappings for ACPI GPIOs
On Monday, November 17, 2014 01:28:54 PM Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >> On Monday, November 03, 2014 02:22:10 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> >>> With that change:
> >>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> OK, made the changes and added your Reviewed-by.
> >>
> >> One semi-related question though. Alexandre ACKed the patch before, so
> >> what did that mean from the GPIO subsystem's perspective? Was the patch
> >> approved, not approved, semi-approved?
> >
> > It just means we are not always entirely aligned, it's not like
> > Alexandre and I have meetings on the side and decide what to
> > say, it's just these mails. I do trust him, I wouldn't get mad if it
> > had been merged just wanted some polishing when I could get
> > it...
>
> In case of conflicting feedback between me and Linus, it goes without
> saying that Linus' opinion should prevail. I am trying to help a bit
> and take some of the burden off his shoulders, but have neither his
> skill nor his experience (which shows when you compare our patch
> reviews). So for important stuff it is a good idea to wait until both
> of us give a ack - the most likely conflict scenario being that I give
> a pass overlooking something that Linus will catch.
Thanks for the clarification!
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists