[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546BA747.6000703@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:08:39 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] netlink: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the
function call "__module_get"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:03:13 +0100
The __module_get() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index f1de72d..0317b91 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -142,8 +142,7 @@ int netlink_add_tap(struct netlink_tap *nt)
list_add_rcu(&nt->list, &netlink_tap_all);
spin_unlock(&netlink_tap_lock);
- if (nt->module)
- __module_get(nt->module);
+ __module_get(nt->module);
return 0;
}
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists