[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141119081438.3df66238@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:14:38 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: vfp: Silence mvfr0 unused variable warning
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:56:31 -0800 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell reports that commit 3f4c9f8f0a20 ("ARM: 8197/1:
> vfp: Fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on CPUID based cpus") introduced an
> unused variable warning.
>
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c: In function 'vfp_init':
> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:725:6: warning: unused variable 'mvfr0'
> [-Wunused-variable]
> u32 mvfr0;
>
> Silence this warning by using IS_ENABLED instead of ifdefs.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Looks good (though I haven't tested it). One small nit below:
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFPv3)) {
> + mvfr0 = fmrx(MVFR0);
Now that you have a block here, you could move the declaration of mvfr0
into this block, right?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists